Solutions › By Industry › Technology & Software

💻 Technology & Software · Built for engineering-led companies · OKR + Talent + Analytics

Your engineers are your
most valuable asset.
Treat them like it.

Average cost to replace a senior engineer: $60,000. Average time to full productivity: 4 months. Average notice of flight risk before resignation: 0 weeks. Tanca gives you those weeks back — with AI that watches the signals your spreadsheets can't.

$60K+
Cost to replace one senior engineer (recruit + ramp)
6 wks
Average AI flight risk early warning before resignation
40%
Engineering turnover reduction in Year 1 on Tanca
app.tanca.io/people-ops · CloudStream Technologies · Q2 2026
Dashboard
OKR Tracker
Headcount
Flight Risk
AI Intelligence ✦
🏢 CloudStream Technologies
💻 Engineering (52)
Backend Squad (18)
Frontend Squad (14)
Platform & Infra (12)
Mobile Team (8)
🎨 Product & Design (16)
📊 Data & AI (8)
💼 Sales & GTM (24)
🎧 Customer Success (14)
⚡ AI Alert: 3 flight risks
87%
HC-Revenue Alignment
+5% vs Q1
$76K
Revenue per Engineer
+8% YoY
3
High Flight Risk
next 90 days
5
Understaffed Roles
vs Q2 roadmap
💡 Strategic Insights LIVE
🔴
Revenue Risk
Engineering at 85% capacity. Q2 roadmap requires +40% output. Recommend 3 hires by April.
🟠
Retention Risk
3 senior engineers below market P50. 12% Engineering turnover. AI predicts high flight risk — 90 days.
🟢
Cost Efficiency
Product & R&D labor ratio: 38%. Within optimal SaaS range (35-40%). ✅
🎯 Dept Efficiency Score
Product & R&D 92%
Engineering 76%
Marketing 65%
Sales 48%
🤖 Headcount AI Advisor

Hi! I'm your Headcount Strategy AI. What would you like to explore?

3 senior engineers are below market P50. What's the risk?

🔴 Flight risk assessment:

  • • Nguyen Van Minh: $24K below P50
  • • Tran Thi Lan: $18K below P50
  • • Pham Quoc Bao: $21K below P50

Trusted by 500+ technology companies across Southeast Asia

500+
Tech companies on Tanca
6 weeks
Average AI flight risk warning
87%
Average HC-to-revenue alignment
40%
Engineering turnover reduction

IF THIS SOUNDS LIKE YOUR QUARTER

Tech doesn't have an HR problem. It has a people intelligence problem — and it costs millions.

The best engineering orgs treat headcount like product strategy. Most are still running people decisions on gut instinct and spreadsheets.

🚪

Your best engineer just accepted an offer from a competitor. You had no idea they were looking.

By the time the resignation lands in your inbox, it's been decided for 6 weeks. The LinkedIn profile updates, the velocity dips, the learning activity stall — all happened in plain sight. Nobody was watching the data.

💰

$60,000 to replace one senior engineer. $340,000 in delayed roadmap.

Recruiting fees. Interview time. Onboarding ramp. The 3-4 months before a new hire ships anything meaningful. Multiply that by your turnover rate and that's a number nobody puts in the board deck.

📊

OKRs are set every quarter. Nobody knows how they're tracking.

Individual OKRs live in spreadsheets and Notion pages. Team OKRs don't cascade from company strategy. Quarter-end review is always a surprise — for everyone.

🌏

Half your engineering team is remote. You have no idea who's actually working.

Not surveillance — visibility. Is the team productive? Are people disengaged? Is someone doing their best work or quietly burning out? You genuinely don't know, because the data doesn't exist.

🎯

Engineering headcount is always behind the roadmap. By the time you hire, it's too late.

Hiring takes 45 days minimum. Your Q3 feature needs to be staffed in Q1. Without a data-driven hiring plan connected to product roadmap, you're always reacting, never planning.

💸

Salary bands are 6-10% below market. You don't know until engineers leave.

The exit interview reveals: "I got a better offer." The offer was $18K more. You could have retained them for $18K. It costs $60K to replace them. A compensation benchmark tool would have surfaced this 12 months ago.

💻 BUILT FOR TECH

Every engineering people challenge. One connected intelligence layer.

Tanca connects OKR tracking, talent intelligence, hiring pipeline, compensation benchmarking, and flight risk AI — built for how engineering organizations actually operate.

🎯
AI

OKR & KPI Intelligence

Real-time OKR tracking from company → team → individual. AI detects misalignment, flags at-risk Key Results, and generates quarterly review insights automatically.

Auto-cascade · Misalignment alerts
🌏

Remote & Hybrid Work

Flexible attendance: WiFi, GPS, WFH toggle. Async-first workflows. Location-agnostic payroll. Works whether your team is in HCM, Singapore, or Bali.

WFH · Hybrid · Cross-border
🤖
AI

AI Flight Risk Detection

AI monitors 6 behavioral signals per engineer. Velocity decline. Learning stall. Collaboration withdrawal. Alert arrives 6 weeks before resignation.

6-week early warning
💰

Compensation Benchmarking

Real-time market salary data for every engineering role. Know immediately when your bands fall below P50. Make comp decisions with data, not gut feeling.

P50/P75 market data
🎯
AI

Engineering Hiring Pipeline

AI screens technical CVs, runs async interviews, scores candidates. Build the hiring plan from roadmap requirements. 45-day average time-to-hire.

CV AI · Role Test Quiz
📊
AI

People Analytics

HC-to-ARR alignment. Department efficiency scores. 5-year workforce forecast. Every people decision backed by data, not politics.

Revenue intelligence
🎯 OKR INTELLIGENCE · COMPANY → TEAM → INDIVIDUAL · AUTO-CASCADE

OKRs that actually connect strategy to engineer output.

Individual OKRs cascade from company strategy automatically. AI checks alignment weekly, flags Key Results at risk, and generates quarterly review packets — so every 1-on-1 is backed by data, not memory.

🎯 OKR Tracker · Q2 2026 · CloudStream Technologies 87% company OKR health

COMPANY OKR CASCADE · Q2 2026

O1: Launch AI-Powered Hiring Suite by Q3

68% · 3 Key Results · 2 on track · 1 at risk

Engineering Team → AI Product Squad

KR2: Ship CV Screening AI in prod · due Jun 30

Sprint 14 velocity: 42 story pts · on track ✅

NV

Nguyen Van Minh · Backend Lead

Build AI scoring engine API · P0

On Track
TL

Tran Thi Lan · Senior Frontend

Build candidate interview UI · P0

On Track
PQ

Pham Quoc Bao · DevOps

Production deployment pipeline · P1

At Risk ⚠️

Q2 OKR HEALTH SUMMARY

68%
Company O1 progress
82%
Engineering team avg
2
Key Results at risk
0
Key Results off track

✦ AI Alignment Check: DevOps individual OKRs show 34% alignment with company O1. Recommend re-cascade in next sprint planning.

OKR review packets auto-generated weekly · Manager 1-on-1 agendas include AI evidence

🔗

AUTO-CASCADE

Strategy → Squad → Sprint

Company OKRs cascade to team, then individual automatically. Every engineer knows exactly how their work connects to ARR.

Full alignment visibility
🤖
AI

AI ALIGNMENT CHECK

Disconnected OKRs flagged instantly

AI checks weekly: is each individual OKR genuinely contributing to a company objective? Busy work gets surfaced before quarter end.

Weekly scan
📊
AI

REVIEW INTELLIGENCE

1-on-1s backed by data

Manager review packets generated automatically: OKR progress, velocity trend, behavioral signals, suggested talking points.

AI-generated evidence
💻 The people platform built for engineering-led companies

Your engineers build the product. Tanca builds the team that keeps them.

OKR intelligence. Flight risk AI. Compensation benchmarking. Remote-first attendance. Engineering hiring pipeline. 14-day free trial — all tech features included.

🎯 OKR Cascade · 🤖 Flight Risk AI · 💰 Salary Benchmarks · 🌏 Remote Work · 📊 People Analytics